Page 2 of 3

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Thu May 31, 2018 9:28 pm
by EHSMeanGreen
SF Band dad wrote:Union has 300 more students? That's just awful!!! :o

1 Wando High School 4,365
2 Dorman High School 3,344
3 Summerville High School 3,012
4 Carolina Forest High School 2,425
5 Byrnes High School 2,368
-------------
43 Lugoff-Elgin High School 1,631
44 South Florence High School 1,627
46 Laurens District 55 High School 1,607
47 Greenwood High School 1,583
49 Berkeley High School 1,547
I'm sensing sarcasm. :idea:
To be fair, the article was referring to Union currently having a 300 student advantage within 3A Region 3.
Let's see how your Region looks....

------5A Region 6---------
4 Carolina Forest High School 2,425
27 West Florence High School 1,833
34 Socastee High School 1,724
37 Conway High School 1,688
41 St. James High School 1,636
44 South Florence High School 1,627

Carolina Forest "only" has everybody in your Region by 590+. ;)

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Thu May 31, 2018 10:08 pm
by SF Band dad
CITYSLICKER wrote:BANDBABY, THOSE NUMBER ARE REALLY INCORRECT, STAGS HAVE 1812
Those are last year's 135ADM numbers which were used in the current realignment process.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2018 10:00 am
by EHSMeanGreen
Currently working on a chart comparing the difference in enrollments within the Regions and how many times larger the biggest schools are within those regions.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:06 am
by Davidjr1030
Well as a St. James Sharks student (I’m 16 Years old) and a fan of them as well, I was LOOKING FORWARD to being with in 5A. Personally, I would rather be with Socastee due to the Major Rivalry. By my calculations we have what 48 teams in 5A if I’m right pending lawsuit? I really hope the lawsuit, although I don’t Know about Y’all, keeps the classifications as they were scheduled to be, or at the least the teams that are suing are put where they are and we go with the 2018 plan with the modifications. Plus, St. James would NOT be the smallest school in 5A, Sorry South Florence and Greenwood should the realignment stand as is.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 10:45 am
by CITYSLICKER
PLAYERS SHOULD PLAY AND NOT BE HERE.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:04 am
by DeCav
Davidjr1030, generally we don't pay excessive amounts of attention to anything SLICK says but it's generally accepted protocol that players, coaches, and parents don't post or at least if they do that they keep their affiliation discreet and close to the vest. Thanks for sharing though.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:18 am
by CITYSLICKER
SHUT UP, VAMP

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:55 pm
by DeCav
Go back to gnawing on your pool noodle SLICK.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 1:04 pm
by SCPrepTalk
Davidjr1030 wrote:Well as a St. James Sharks student (I’m 16 Years old) and a fan of them as well, I was LOOKING FORWARD to being with in 5A. Personally, I would rather be with Socastee due to the Major Rivalry. By my calculations we have what 48 teams in 5A if I’m right pending lawsuit? I really hope the lawsuit, although I don’t Know about Y’all, keeps the classifications as they were scheduled to be, or at the least the teams that are suing are put where they are and we go with the 2018 plan with the modifications. Plus, St. James would NOT be the smallest school in 5A, Sorry South Florence and Greenwood should the realignment stand as is.

Welcome to the board.
Good Luck to St. James this season.

Re: SCHSL lawsuit a complicated one

Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:01 pm
by Rebel-Fan-74
What's the latest?